c_leed wrote:borrowed and/or stolen pictures being used
There's no such thing as borrowed, it's either stolen or legitimately used. With some commendable exceptions, in my experience "familiar photos" are usually theft, plain and simple. IMHO would avoid a retailer that doesn't use their own pictures. If they can't be bothered even paying for or taking their own pics, then I would not place much faith in their identifying the fish or caring for the fish correctly either.
c_leed wrote:"That Fish Place" is exactly it's name.
And these guys look like they have taken the time to photograph their own stock well. I agree with Racoll that it's got a "took from a book look" but that's maybe just because it's a good pic scaled down. It looks like theirs once you browse the rest of their site. I usually recognise stolen catfish pics as they are either from this site, one of our contributors or a book I've read!
I agree with Steve that the pic looks misidentified, for me it's like
.
Jools
