Bleeker's revision of Hamilton

For the discussion of catfish systematics. Post here to draw our attention to new publications or to discuss existing works.
Post Reply
User avatar
Dinyar
Posts: 1286
Joined: 31 Dec 2002, 00:34
My articles: 3
My images: 228
My catfish: 10
My cats species list: 3 (i:0, k:0)
Spotted: 94
Location 1: New York, NY, USA
Interests: Mochokidae, Claroteidae, Bagridae, Malepteruridae, Chacidae, Heteropneustidae, Clariidae, Sisoridae, Loricariiadae

Bleeker's revision of Hamilton

Post by Dinyar »

Was the publication in which Bleeker revised Hamilton's 1822 species names Bleeker, P.   1854  Nalezingen op de ichthyologische fauna van Bengalen en Hindostan?

And what does "Nalezingen" mean?

Dinyar
User avatar
Erwin
Posts: 184
Joined: 08 Oct 2003, 14:37
My articles: 1
My images: 6
Spotted: 6
Location 1: Augsburg, Germany
Interests: esp. cichlids, catfish
Contact:

Post by Erwin »

Hi Dinyar,

"Nalezing" means in a word to word translation "second harvest" in the sence of "revision".

"Nalezingen" is plural.

Best Wishes

Erwin
User avatar
Silurus
Posts: 12381
Joined: 31 Dec 2002, 11:35
I've donated: $12.00!
My articles: 55
My images: 885
My catfish: 1
My cats species list: 90 (i:0, k:0)
Spotted: 420
Location 1: Singapore
Location 2: Moderator Emeritus

Post by Silurus »

Was the publication in which Bleeker revised Hamilton's 1822 species names Bleeker, P.   1854  Nalezingen op de ichthyologische fauna van Bengalen en Hindostan?
This was actually Bleeker's work on Indian catfishes after he had received a small collection. The work tries to address the identities of the Hamilton names (probably in the erroneous belief that they may have been incorrectly formed). It's not actually a true revision in the sense that we understand it today.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Taxonomy & Science News”