Original descriptions

A historical forum for issues reported in the suggestions and bugs forum that have been subsequently fixed or resolved.
Post Reply
Rusty
Posts: 682
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 14:51
Location 1: New York, NY
Interests: Mochokidae, Clariidae, Heteropneustidae, Malapteruridae, Chacidae, Cetopsidae, Bagridae, Amphilidae
Contact:

Original descriptions

Post by Rusty »

I have a few (read: > a dozen) descriptions by Boulenger, Sykes, and other old timers typed up. These were published 100 years or more ago, meaning their copyrights are long gone. So, would the original descriptions of a select few fish be interesting in the CLog? If they are of interest, I have access to plenty of them...

Rusty
User avatar
Silurus
Posts: 12412
Joined: 31 Dec 2002, 11:35
I've donated: $12.00!
My articles: 55
My images: 890
My catfish: 1
My cats species list: 90 (i:1, k:0)
Spotted: 423
Location 1: Singapore
Location 2: Moderator Emeritus

Post by Silurus »

Did think about this once, but given that many of these old descriptions are not very well-done by today's standards, even scientists find it difficult to extract useful information from them, let alone the average aquarist.
The space and bandwidth can be better employed for other purposes.
Image
User avatar
Jools
Expert
Posts: 16124
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 15:25
My articles: 198
My images: 948
My catfish: 237
My cats species list: 87 (i:237, k:1)
My BLogs: 7 (i:10, p:202)
My Wishlist: 23
Spotted: 450
Location 1: Middle Earth,
Location 2: Scotland
Interests: All things aquatic, Sci-Fi, photography and travel. Oh, and beer.
Contact:

Post by Jools »

If they have nice illustrations or map information then I think we could use images.

Jools
User avatar
Dinyar
Posts: 1286
Joined: 31 Dec 2002, 00:34
My articles: 3
My images: 228
My catfish: 10
My cats species list: 3 (i:10, k:0)
Spotted: 94
Location 1: New York, NY, USA
Interests: Mochokidae, Claroteidae, Bagridae, Malepteruridae, Chacidae, Heteropneustidae, Clariidae, Sisoridae, Loricariiadae

Post by Dinyar »

Silurus wrote:Did think about this once, but given that many of these old descriptions are not very well-done by today's standards, even scientists find it difficult to extract useful information from them, let alone the average aquarist.
The space and bandwidth can be better employed for other purposes.
Not to sound contentious, but I actually prefer reading mid-19th century descriptions to early 21st century ones. The former are written in clear, if sometimes quaint, English, whereas the latter usually read like gobbledygook. It's actually fun to read people like Hamilton-Buchanan, which is more than I can say for any contemporary descriptions. I wonder if scientific accuracy must always be at the expense of writing readable English?

Dinyar
User avatar
Silurus
Posts: 12412
Joined: 31 Dec 2002, 11:35
I've donated: $12.00!
My articles: 55
My images: 890
My catfish: 1
My cats species list: 90 (i:1, k:0)
Spotted: 423
Location 1: Singapore
Location 2: Moderator Emeritus

Post by Silurus »

Sure, it makes for good reading and all, but since the point of making original descriptions easily available to non-scientists is for them to check the identities of their fish, the utility of the (often inadequate) descriptions is very low.
If you read something like Hamilton or Cuvier & Valenciennes, the description of any given species of say, Mystus, can be used to describe almost any bagrid.
Image
User avatar
Jools
Expert
Posts: 16124
Joined: 30 Dec 2002, 15:25
My articles: 198
My images: 948
My catfish: 237
My cats species list: 87 (i:237, k:1)
My BLogs: 7 (i:10, p:202)
My Wishlist: 23
Spotted: 450
Location 1: Middle Earth,
Location 2: Scotland
Interests: All things aquatic, Sci-Fi, photography and travel. Oh, and beer.
Contact:

Post by Jools »

I would still like to use images or maps...

Jools
Post Reply

Return to “All Resolved Issues”